Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Dilbert v. Fisher
as 24-444
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD ALAN DILBERT
Respondent / Appellee:
R. FISHER
DILBERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09277
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DILBERT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DILBERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10203
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DILBERT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HERNANDEZ et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST I, LP et al
as 2:2022cv04322
Plaintiff:
DILBERT HERNANDEZ and MILENIS GONZALEZ, HIS SPOUSE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST I, LP, 300-400 PARK PLAZA DRIVE, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES REPRESENTING UNKNOWN CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS AND/OR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES OR OTHER TYPES OF LEGAL ENTITIES)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Dilbert v. Fisher
as 1:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Clifford Alan Dilbert
Defendant:
R. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dilbert v. Fisher
as 5:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
Clifford Alan Dilbert
Defendant:
Warden R. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: New York City Board of
as 21-2421
Plaintiff:
Elsa Gulino, Mayling Ralph, Peter Wilds and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tami Burgess-Dilbert
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Reid-Dilbert v. United States of America
as 8:2021cv01301
Plaintiff:
Calbot Reid-Dilbert
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
