Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Lashon Jacks, et al v. DirectSat USA, LLC, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LASHON JACKS, MORRIE BELL and ERRICK RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTSAT USA, LLC, UNITEK USA, , LLC, JAY HEABERLIN and others
Lashon Jacks, et al v. DirectSat USA, LLC, et al
as 22-8006
Petitioner:
LASHON JACKS, MORRIE BELL and ERRICK RHODES
Respondent:
DIRECTSAT USA, LLC, UNITEK USA, , LLC, JAY HEABERLIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07523
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GUICE et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03379
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GUICE , STEVEN SCOTT , THOMAS PEDICORD and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC and DIRECTSAT, USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perry v. Krieger Beard Services LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Morgan Perry, Travis Fain, Brian Fox and others
Defendant:
Directv LLC, AT&T Corp., DIRECTSAT USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Comer et al v. DirecTV, LLC
as 3:2016mc00033
Plaintiff:
Charles Comer, Brian Delgado and Donald Dowd
Defendant:
DirecTV, LLC and DirectSat USA, LLC
Interested_party:
Skylink LTD
Jay Lewis v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 15-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY LEWIS, KELTON SHAW and MANUEL GARCIA
Plaintiff:
JUNE LEFTWICH
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTV, INCORPORATED, DIRECTV, LLC and DIRECTSAT USA, LLC
Marlon Hall v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 15-1857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON HALL, JOHN WOOD, ALIX PIERRE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALBRECHT
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTV, INCORPORATED, DIRECTV, LLC, DIRECTV HOME SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
