Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Newkirk v. Clarke, et al
as 7:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Dept. of Corrections, Lisa Hernandez, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyer v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Matthew Caleb Sawyer
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Director Dept of Corrections, Medical Director of Elayn Hunt Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director
as 22-7253
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR, Dept. of Corrections
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director
as 22-6822
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR, Dept. of Corrections
Jack Greene v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 21-2320
Defendant / Appellee:
Solomon Graves, Director, Dept of Corrections, Asa Hutchinson, Governor, State of Arkansas and Lisa Peters, Director, Federal Public Defenders Office
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jack Gordon Greene
Jones v. Director, Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2021cv00311
Respondent:
Director, Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner:
Markese L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director
as 21-6078
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR, Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Carl Davis v. David Shinn
as 20-15790
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director, Dept of Correction, State of Arizona
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL DWIGHT DAVIS
Newkirk v. Director, Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2017cv00785
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
