Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
To et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mr. Liem Phat Do, Ms. Phung Kim To, Phung Kim To and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10856
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Xinyi Jiang v. USCIS, et al
as 21-35198
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary Department of Homeland Security, LAURA B. ZUCHOWSKI, Director USCIS Vermont Service Center, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
XINYI JIANG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00228
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv60850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Askar Saleh Ali (A043-550-030) v. Mukasey et al
as 6:2008mc06037
Plaintiff:
Askar Saleh Ali (A043-550-030)
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, The United States Department of Justice, Commissioner, Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
