Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MEYERS v. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE et al
as 1:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE, U.S. ATTORNEY, U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Larry Klayman v. President of the USA, et al
as 16-14963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT USA, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, THOMAS E. BRANDON, Deputy Director of the U.S. Department of Justice, Head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as U.S. Attorney General and others
Larry Klayman v. President of the USA, et al
as 16-14963
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, c/o U.S. Department of Justice Attn: Attorney General Loretta Lynch 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as U.S. Attorney General, PRESIDENT USA, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Angel Rivera v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 10-5258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angel Ruiz Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney, Mary-Patrice Brown, Director of the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Rivera, Angel Ruiz v. Mukasey, Michael B., et al
as 08-5015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angel Ruiz Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, United States Attorney, H. Marshall Jerrett, Director of the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
