Cases 11 - 20 of 37
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Kennedy et al (TV2)
as 3:2011cv00477
Plaintiff:
DirecTV Inc
Defendant:
Chad Kennedy, Jennifer Kennedy and CGK, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Norys
as 3:2011cv00925
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Leonard Norys
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Spirit Broadband, LLC v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00553
Plaintiff:
Spirit Broadband, LLC
Defendant:
DIRECTV, Inc. , Direct Video Networks, Inc. and People's Choice Cable, LLC
Counter_plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Spirit Broadband, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Holtsberry et al
as 3:2010cv02278
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas R Holtsberry, Richard Watkins and Holtsberry Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Directv, Inc. v. Slogar et al
as 5:2010cv01839
Plaintiff:
Directv, Inc.
Defendant:
Ronald E Slogar and Loch Erie Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Bolognue et al
as 5:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Bolognue and English Stick, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Herchenrader et al
as 3:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Dennis Herchenrader and Don and Den, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Boyd et al
as 1:2010cv00534
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
James G Boyd and Cornerstone Bar & Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Belew et al
as 1:2009cv01158
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Kyle D. Belew and Belew Entertainment Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 546 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Amos et al
as 3:2009cv00795
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Clifton W. Amos, Brian M. Hayden and CBD & T, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
