Cases 1 - 10 of 34
BADON v. DISCOUNT TIRE CO., INC.
as 2:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
ALBY BADON
Defendant:
DISCOUNT TIRE CO., INC.
Not Classified By Court:
Adam Blake LeCrone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Retaliation Wrongful Termination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1612 - FMLA: Leave Requirements
Alvarez v. Discount Tire Co., Inc.
as 4:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Nelson Alvarez
Defendant:
Discount Tire Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Swihart v. General Motors LLC et al
as 5:2021cv01141
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Swihart
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and Discount Tire Co of Oklahoma Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trujillo v. The Renalt-Thomas Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01072
Plaintiff:
William Trujillo
Defendant:
The Renalt-Thomas Corporation a Michigan corporation doing business as Discount Tire Company/America's Tire Co., Discount Tire Co., Inc. and Tommy Herberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RING v. DISCOUNT TIRE CO
as 4:2021cv00441
Plaintiff:
HILLARY RING
Defendant:
DISCOUNT TIRE CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv06151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fairchild et al v. Whitworth et al
as 3:2020cv01425
Plaintiff:
William Levi Fairchild, Olivia Fairchild and Sarah Fairchild
Defendant:
Knowles Enterprises, LLC, Discount Tire Co. of Washington, Inc., Brandon A Whitworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
