Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kristine Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Bill Stange, Billy Loflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Junior Robinson
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah, Correctional Officer John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 et al v. Fort Osage R-1 School District et al
as 4:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 and Jane Doe #1
Defendant:
Fort Osage R-1 School District, Jason Snodgrass and Jane Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Doe v. Koester et al
as 4:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Christopher E Koester, Kenneth L. Gregory, Mark D Eberwein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newton v. Compass Health Network et al
as 4:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Elroy G. Newton
Defendant:
Compass Health Network, Kevin Schmidt, Lisa Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Young v. City of St. John et al
as 4:2021cv00566
Defendant:
Chad Rackers, Travis Brown, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv03144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taylor v. New Madrid County et al
as 1:2020cv00022
Defendant:
John Doe #2, New Madrid County, Joan L. Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Shelby Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
