Cases 31 - 40 of 104
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01942
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 16-18, JOHN DOE 1-3, JOHN DOE 10-12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
DREW RICE, MICHAEL REPICI, JOSEPH MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
BAKEER ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DOBIN et al
as 2:2018cv17515
Defendant:
ELI HALTOVSKY, HON. ANNE B. THOMPSON, ANDREA DOBIN, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN Z. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELLIOTT v. DOE et al
as 3:2018cv06348
Plaintiff:
TARIQ ELLIOTT
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JAMES PIGOTT, MICHAEL DEANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perez v. Larson et al
as 3:2017cv02341
Plaintiff:
Joel Perez
Defendant:
James J. Larson, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUISEPPE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2017cv04880
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL GUISEPPE
Defendant:
MCFADDEN , REED , JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERONVIL v. JANE DOE #1 et al
as 2:2017cv08055
Plaintiff:
LEO MERONVIL
Defendant:
JANE DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2017cv01591
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillips
Defendant:
Kerestes, Beggs, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Evans v. Mercy Suburban Hospital, et al
as 16-3285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
EVANS v. MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv03426
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
