Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Schand v. McMahon, et al
as 19-2125
Defendant / Appellant: RAYMOND P. MUISE, Former Springfield Police Detective, ELMER MCMAHON, Former Springfield Police Detectives, MICHAEL REID, Former Springfield Police Detective and others
Plaintiff: KIELE SCHAND, MIA SCHAND, MARK SCHAND, JR. and others
Defendant: JOHN/JANE DOES, 1 through 10, as-yet unknown officers, HAMPDEN COUNTY, PAUL MCNULTY, Former Springfield Police Detectives and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARK SCHAND
Oakley Grain, Inc., et al v. M. Randy Rice, et al
as 19-6034
Defendant: Neauman Coleman & Co LLC, Turner Grain Merchandising, Inc., Harper Ross and others
Defendant / Appellee: Scott Mears Farms, Inc. and Travis Mears Farms, Inc.
Not Yet Classified: M. Randy Rice
Plaintiff / Appellant: Bruce Oakley, Inc. and Oakley Grain, Inc.
Debtor: In re: Turner Grain Merchandising, Inc., doing business as Turner Grain, Inc.
Doe 1 et al v. United States Olympic Committee
as 1:2019cv00902
Defendant: Angela M. Ruggiero, Ursula M. Burns, John S. Hendricks and others
Plaintiff: Jane ALC Doe 29, Jane KRA Doe 32, Jane KM Doe 15 and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Laurant v. The City of New York
as 19-1237
Plaintiff / Appellant: Andre J. Laurant
Defendant / Appellee: City of New York
Defendant: John Does 11-20, as Members, Personnel Review Board, Fire Department City of New York each sued individually and in their official capacities as employees of defendant The City of New York and John Does 1-10, as Members, Candidate Investigation Division, Fire Department City of New York
Jay Pember v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-15689
Defendant: SHUMAN, Deputy Warden, STG Committee Member, Sued Individually and in Official Capacity, KEITH SMITH, Security Operations Administrator, Sued Individually and in Official Capacity, JAMES BAIRD, MD in Chandler, Sued Individually and in Official Capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee: DAYS, Deputy Warden, Grievance, BABICH, Medical Director - Browning Unit, Sued Individually and in Official Capacity, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAY LYNN PEMBER
L.B. Doe 1 et al v. United States Olympic Committee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00737
Plaintiff: Jane A.C. Doe 27, Jane I.B. Doe 11, Jane D.C. Doe 25 and others
Defendant: Angela M. Ruggiero, William C. Marlot, James M. Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 36 U.S.C. § 220501
Aamoth et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv12276
Plaintiff: John Doe 17, Rodrigo Gomez Castillo, Joseph P. Deuel and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01710
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: North Sea Brent Crude O We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2233
Plaintiff: Michael Sevy, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,, Gregory H. Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Patricia Benvenuto, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Prime International Trading, Ltd., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, White Oaks Fund LP, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Kevin McDonnell, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: BP PLC, Trafigura Beheer B.V., Trafigura AG and others
Defendant: Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA, John Doe 1 and others
Confederacion Hipica de Puerto Rico, Inc. et al v. Confederacion de Jinetes Puertorriquenos, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02256
Plaintiff: Confederacion Hipica de Puerto Rico, Inc. and Camarero Racetrack Corp.
Defendant: Confederacion de Jinetes Puertorriquenos, Inc. , Asociacion de Jinetes de Puerto Rico, Inc. , Abner Adorno and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?