Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Dewalt v. Brauner et al
as 4:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Adam Randazzo, John Doe #5, Unknown Eckhoff and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Dewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn Maxfield v. City of Kansas City, et al
as 19-1061
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane Doe 4, Unknown Open Facility, John Doe, I, Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vaughn Gary Maxfield
Smith v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2018cv05111
Defendant:
John Doe 7, John Doe 6, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
James Albert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxfield v. City of Kansas City et al
as 4:2018cv00896
Defendant:
Unknown Open Facility, Jane Doe 1, Unknown Building and others
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Gary Maxfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. Mactinez et al
as 6:2018cv03310
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Andre Faulkner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Doe #1 et al
as 4:2018cv00710
Defendant:
John Doe #2, John Doe #4, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Ziani et al
as 0:2018cv02556
Defendant:
Eric Ziani, Piet Van Ryckeghem, Marcel Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc., Comerica Bank & Trust, N.A. as Personal Representative of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Comerica Bank & Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Blatner v. Ochs et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Defendant:
John Doe #4, John Doe #1, Charles Ochs and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Keith Blatner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spillman v. Arnott et al
as 6:2018cv03207
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 2, John Doe 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Carson T Spillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Arnott et al
as 6:2018cv03208
Defendant:
Jim Arnott, John Doe 3, Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
