Cases 1 - 10 of 5,907
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer Edward Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pugh v. Devos et al
as 3:2024cv05376
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Pugh
Defendant:
Keith Devos, Tabitha Yockey, Shawn Candella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dixon v. Goguen et al
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Ryan Adam Dixon
Defendant:
Jie Liang Goguen and John/Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Fungi Perfecti LLC et al v. JT Best Deals LLC
as 2:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Fungi Perfecti LLC and Turtle Bear Holdings LLC
Defendant:
JT Best Deals LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brown et al v. Pacific Market International LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Mackenzie Brown, Meiling Robinson, Shea Ritchie and others
Defendant:
Pacific Market International LLC and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Bishop-McKean v. Murray et al
as 3:2024cv05199
Plaintiff:
Renee Bishop-McKean
Defendant:
Justin Murray, Carlson, Paul Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
