Cases 1 - 10 of 5,549
Humphrey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Lakeith Humphrey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillespie v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 1:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Alan Gillespie
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Kenneth Black, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Doe #1 MLC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
JOELLE NEW
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Officer John Doe #1 and Officer John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Mack Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Toby Whitaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
