Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Mallory v. Dorchester County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv01688
Plaintiff:
Prince Charles Mallory
Defendant:
Dorchester County Detention Center, John Does 1-44, 2 Medical University of South Carolina Mental Health Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Cavazos v. Trejo, et al
as 22-55792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CAVAZOS
Defendant / Appellee:
TREJO, GARILASO, Mr.; First name unknown, ROGERS, Mr.; First name unknown and others
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 v. Does 1-44, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2020cv05009
Plaintiff:
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1
Defendant:
Does 1-44, As Identified in Exhibit 2
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Associated Recovery L.L.C. v. John Does 1- 44
as 18-10596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Associated Recovery L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
John Does 1- 44, 744.com, 028.com and others
Associated Recovery L.L.C. v. John Does 1- 44, et al
as 18-10596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSOCIATED RECOVERY L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOES 1- 44, 744.COM, 028.COM and others
Associated Recovery, LLC v. John Does 1-44 et al
as 3:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Associated Recovery LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-44 , 744.com , 028.com and others
Movant:
Ye Yu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 ac
Associated Recovery LLC v. John Does 1-44 et al
as 3:2016cv01025
Plaintiff:
Associated Recovery LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-44 , 744.com , 028.com and others
Associated Recovery, LLC v. John Does 1-44 et al
as 1:2015cv01723
Plaintiff:
Associated Recovery, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-44, 744.com, 028.com and others
Petitioner:
Ye Yu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-44
as 1:2014cv04940
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC.
Defendant:
Does 1-44
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC. v. Does 1-44
as 1:2014cv04937
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC.
Defendant:
Does 1-44
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
