Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Adelson v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11291
Plaintiff:
Wendy Adelson and Wendy B. Adelson [E-FILER]
Defendant:
County of Oakland, Doe John, John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Martens v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Defendant:
Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, LLC, Corey L. Tomlinson, City of Findlay and others
Plaintiff:
George Martens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lomax v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2021cv11533
Defendant:
RN Long, Officer/Guard Nicholson, Dr. Patsalis and others
Plaintiff:
James Lomax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Annie Ball v. Cocke County, TN, et al
as 21-5261
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEWPORT, TN, JANE DOE, WES KEYS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNIE MONETT BALL, as next friend and mother to HENRY GREGORY STROUD (Deceased)
Coleman v. City of University Heights, et al.,
as 1:2016cv01229
Plaintiff:
Kathy Coleman
Defendant:
City of University Heights, University Heights Mayor Susan Infeld, University Heights Police Sgt. Orians and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Amaral et al v. Hardin County et al
as 3:2009cv00460
Plaintiff:
Paul Amaral, Larry Ashford, Jeremiah Baggett and others
Defendant:
Hardin County, Louis B. Lawson, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hernandez v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2007cv00259
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Garcia Hernandez, Alfredo Garcia Hernandez and Alfredo Garcia Hernandez
Defendant:
Lexington Fayette Urban County Government, Robert Walker, Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
