Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BAKER v. AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Lead Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BAKER
Defendant:
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., DOE JOHN, JASON SNEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PERRONG v. JOHN DOE CORPORATION, et al.
as 2:2021cv04185
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PERRONG
Defendant:
Gacovino, Lake & Associates and Doe John
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
PAYNE v. MEADE et al
as 2:2021cv03387
Plaintiff:
ADDAN PAYNE
Defendant:
DAVID MEADE, LT. DOE JOHN, JOHN 1-10 DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2021cv01813
Defendant:
ROBERT MCFADDEN, JANE DOE/JOHN DOE, STEVEN MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
DELANO J. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyoming, Pennsylvania v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00255
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Wyoming, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Miller v. Doe et al
as 1:2016cv01611
Plaintiff:
Glenn E. Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe,, Jane Doe/John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. EBURUCH et al
as 2:2016cv02012
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
LAWRENCE EBURUCH, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA REVENUE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
TABANSI v. CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00246
Plaintiff:
SEHU-KESSA SAA TABANSI
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS, INC., CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS, INC. ON SITE REPRESENTATIVE JANE DOE/JOHN DOE, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT LISA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. DERRICOTTE et al
as 2:2014cv06186
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
GUYON DERRICOTTE, MICHAEL WHEELER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS, II. v. ALLEN et al
as 2:2014cv02160
Plaintiff:
STEVEN THOMAS, II.
Defendant:
OFFICER ALLEN, PHILA. POLICE DOE JOHN DOE and CHARLES H. RAMSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
