Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kalesta Healthcare Group LLC et al v. Caldera Care LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02605
Plaintiff:
Kalesta Healthcare Group, LLC, Salt Creek Beach, LLC, Rincon Beach, LLC and others
Defendant:
Caldera Care, LLC, Chaim Wolmark, Eli Oscherowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Perez v. Doheny's, LLC
as 1:2026cv23378
Plaintiff:
Rosario F Perez
Defendant:
Doheny's, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Holloway v. City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv01891
Plaintiff:
Naim Holloway
Defendant:
City of New York, Jeremy Ramos, Matthew Ornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregory Polkowski v. Jack Doheny Companies, Inc.
as 25-2075
Plaintiff:
GREGORY POLKOWSKI
Defendant:
JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC.
DOHENY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv00969
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN DALE DOHENY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Savelskas v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2025cv03206
Plaintiff:
Tomas Savelskas
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Patricia M. Fallon, Mitchell B. Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Savelskas v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2025cv03201
Plaintiff:
Tomas Savelskas
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Patricia M Fallon, Mitchell B Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, et al v. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 25-1076
Plaintiff:
NATHAN J SMITH and HOLLY M SMITH
Defendant:
SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NICOLE BRIGGS, KOPP and others
Polkowski v. Jack Doheny Companies, Inc.
as 2:2025cv10516
Plaintiff:
Gregory Polkowski
Defendant:
Jack Doheny Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
