Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Dominguez v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Steve Dominguez
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Fisherman et al v. Milender et al
as 0:2023cv03836
Plaintiff:
Cory Edward Fisherman, Douglas Michael Edling, Curtis Jay French and others
Defendant:
Nathan Milender, Traci McNamara and Marray Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellenberger v. Dominguez et al
as 4:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
Brian James Ellenberger
Defendant:
Nick Gault, Emily Robinson, Yell County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frost v. Dominguez et al
as 4:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Wesley Frost
Defendant:
Jesus Dominguez, Colt Henderson, Mahaley Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Dominguez et al
as 5:2023cv05194
Plaintiff:
George Lee Roach
Defendant:
Officer Zeus Dominguez and Nurse S. Golden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellenberger v. Dominguez et al
as 5:2023cv05203
Plaintiff:
Brian James Ellenberger
Defendant:
Jail Supervisor Jusus Dominguez, Sheriff Nick Gault, Sergeant Emily Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Dominguez et al
as 4:2023cv01062
Plaintiff:
George Lee Roach
Defendant:
Zeus Dominguez and S Golden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
Melissa Alexander, Michael Wayne Allen, Alan Alsop and others
Defendant:
3M Company
USA v. Dominguez-Vera
as 6:2023cv03200
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
German Dominguez-Vera
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Pablo Dominguez Garcia v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2661
Petitioner:
Pablo Joaquin Dominguez Garcia
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
