Cases 21 - 30 of 611
Poling v. Cumberland County Detention Center
as 5:2023ct03186
Petitioner:
Zachary Nathaniel Poling
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Cumberland County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Charlie Egbert Cain, Brad Donahue, Taimon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz et al v. Enright et al
as 2:2023cv02559
Plaintiff:
Jared Douglas Diaz
Defendant:
Stephen Enright, Jr., Paul Connick, Jr, Gina Patin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Gordon et al
as 5:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kievin Dewayne Gordon
Defendant:
Lexington, KY Community Center, Commander or Captain Mr. Water, Unit. Officer B. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mack v. Donahue
as 1:2023cv00365
Petitioner:
Demetrius Mack
Respondent:
J. Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Cole et al
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Reginald C. Howard
Defendant:
D. Cole, T. Bradshaw, R. Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heyward v. Dinkins et al
as 3:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
L. M. Heyward
Defendant:
Veronica Dinkins, K. Plank, R Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John Custer v. Kevin Lyons, et al
as 23-1150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CUSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN LYONS, JODI M. HOOS, D.A. SHELLY and others
Tucker v. Donahue
as 1:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Dwayne Tucker
Respondent:
James Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Bradford v. Valley, et al
as 23-15032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY, HERNANDEZ, Social Worker, HERRERA, Recreational Therapist and others
Kentrell Welch v. William Gittere, et al
as 23-15042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTRELL D. WELCH
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, FAC #16, DAVID DRUMMOND, Associate Warden, TOLBERT, Correctional Guard, terminated per FAC #16 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
