Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bradford v. Jackson Service Station
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Ty Donald Bradford
Defendant:
Jackson Service Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Contra Costa County Detention Facilities
as 5:2021cv06433
Plaintiff:
Donald Bradford
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Detention Facilities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 3:2012cv01818
Plaintiff:
Philip Bryan , Kathleen Cade , Carol Lame and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv01816
Plaintiff:
Philip Bryan , Kathleen Cade , Carol Lame and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donald Stark v. Barbara Stark, et al
as 09-17201
Appellant:
DONALD BRADFORD STARK
Appellee:
BARBARA STARK, ELIZABETH STARK and SUSAN TSAPANOS
Donald Bradford v. A.p. Green Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-61914
Plaintiff:
Donald Bradford
Defendant:
A.p. Green Industries, Inc
BRADFORD v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv61914
Plaintiff:
DONALD BRADFORD and DONALD BRADFORD
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., MEXICO BRICK & FIRE CLAY CO., A.P. GREEN FIRE BRICK CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01366
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. Guidant Corporation
as 1:2004cv12737
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel., Donald Bradford, Reuel Jay Bawden and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Florida, State of, Texas, state of and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
