Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Donald Green v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
as 2:2015cv05714
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Petitioner:
Donald Green
Diercks et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2014cv00572
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Diercks , Shirley Ester , Bernice Fikes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freitas et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05948
Plaintiff:
Terry Freitas , Lori Freitas , Oleta Burney and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company, Aaipharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. Nieto et al
as 3:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Donald Green
Defendant:
D. Nieto, A. Garcia and J. Tim Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freitas et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv05967
Plaintiff:
Terry Freitas , Lori Freitas , Oleta Burney and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company , AAI Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Nieto et al
as 3:2011cv02023
Plaintiff:
Donald Green
Defendant:
D Nieto, A Garcia and J Tim Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. McEwen
as 3:2011cv00165
Petitioner:
Donald Green
Respondent:
L S McEwen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. The State of California Board of Parole Hearings
as 3:2010cv02516
Petitioner:
Donald Green
Respondent:
The State of California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. City of Napa et al
as 3:2009cv02782
Plaintiff:
Luz Hernandez and Luz Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Napa, Richard Melton, Garth Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald Green v. The State of California Board of Parole Hearing et al
as 3:2008cv01803
Petitioner:
Donald Green
Respondent:
The State of California Board of Parole Hearing and Larry Small
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.