Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ingle v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv16398
Plaintiff:
Bruce Donald Ingle
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrowood Indemnity Company v. Michael Cristini, et al
as 15-1257
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL LOUIS CRISTINI
Defendant:
ALICE INGLES, CITY OF WARREN, MI and PATRICK MCQUEENEY, aka Personal Representative of the Estate of Donald Ingles
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Jeffrey Moldowan v. City of Warren, et al
as 13-1361
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY MICHAEL MOLDOWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WARREN, COUNTY OF MACOMB, ERIC SMITH, Macomb County Prosecutor and others
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALAN WARNICK, DONALD INGLES and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
GEOFFREY N. FIEGER
Michael Cristini v. Warren, City of, et al
as 12-2638
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL LOUIS CRISTINI
Defendant - Appellant:
WARREN, CITY OF and ALICE INGLES, as Guardian for Donald Ingles, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant:
WARREN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.
Michael Cristini v. Warren, City of, et al
as 08-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LOUIS CRISTINI
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN, CITY OF, WARREN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MACOMB COUNTY and others
Ingle v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2008cv00010
Petitioner:
Donald Ingle, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Moldowan v. City of Warren, et al
as 07-2115
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY MICHAEL MOLDOWAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF WARREN, DONALD INGLES and MICHAEL SCHULTZ
Cristini v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2007cv11141
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Cristini and Michael Louis Cristini
Defendant:
Warren, City of, Warren Police Department, Macomb County and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
