Cases 1 - 10 of 38
WHITE v. HAYDEN
as 3:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
DONALD R. WHITE, JR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR et al v. SHIVELY et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW TAYLOR
Defendant:
LESLIE C. SHIVELY, ROBERT PIGMAN, MARY MARGARET LLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
STANLEY et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
DONALD R STANLEY, PEGGY S STANLEY, DONALD RAY STANLEY and others
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sisson v. Potchen
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Donald R Sisson
Defendant:
Potchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sisson v. Potchen
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Donald R Sisson
Defendant:
Potchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorpe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Thorpe
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hammons v. Carroll
as 2:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Hammond and Donald Hammons
Defendant:
Shayne K. Carroll and Shayne Carrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. NOWASKOWSKI et al
as 1:2021cv02291
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant:
RICHARD R. NOWASKOWSKI, MARK R. STETZEL, JENNIFER K. BARTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Henry v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2021cv00006
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Henry
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Not Classified By Court:
Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fml
TAYLOR v. RUSTIC FROG STUDIOS, LLC
as 4:2019cv00185
Plaintiff:
CHIMERE TAYLOR
Defendant:
DONALD R. SCOTT, RUSTIC FROG STUDIOS, LLC and Red Ink, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
