Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Donald Rouse v. Dana Nessel
as 23-1738
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ROUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL, in her official and individual and personal capacity as the Attorney General for the State of Michigan, R. PAUL VIAR, in his official and individual and personal capacity as the Assistant Attorney General for the State of Michigan and DENNIS JAMES, in his official and individual and personal capacity as the Special Agent for the Attorney General's Office
Rouse v. Nessel et al
as 8:2022cv03800
Plaintiff:
Donald Rouse
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, R Paul Viar and Dennis James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Donald Rouse v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 22-1777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ROUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL, Michigan Attorney General, ROBERT PAUL VIAR, Michigan Assistant Attorney General and DENNIS JAMES, Michigan Attorney General Special Agent
Donald Rouse v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 21-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ROUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Michigan, MICHELLE DOERR-TIBBITS, in her official and individual capacity as the Attorney General criminal finance division officer, DEAN ALAN, in his official and individual capacity as the Macomb County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney and others
Rouse v. Nessel et al
as 2:2021cv11626
Plaintiff:
Donald Rouse
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, R. Paul Viar and Dennis James
ROUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92395
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD ROUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rouse v. Nessel et al
as 2:2020cv12088
Defendant:
Michelle Doerr-Tibbits, Peter J. Maceroni, Dean Alan and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prs
Rouse v. Nessel et al
as 8:2020cv00954
Defendant:
Michelle Doerr-Tibbits, Dean Alan, Dana Nessel and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
