Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Smith, Jr. v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02540
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, OnStar, LLC and LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith (PS) v. Star
as 1:2023cv02844
Petitioner:
Donald Smith and James Brookes
Respondent:
Star
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Shamika Fontae Taylor
Defendant:
Jerry Donald Smith, Jr., Parada Enterprise, LLC and Parada Enterprise Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05078
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15836
Plaintiff:
DONALD SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCray v. Smith
as 1:2023cv02171
Plaintiff:
Olivia McCray
Defendant:
Donald Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv02142
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Smith, Rexford Martin, Ronald Matheny and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08703
Plaintiff:
DONALD SMITH, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIPORE v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
MWAMARATUNGA PIPORE
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, DELISHA BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
