Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mohamed Barry v. David Anderson, et al
as 22-3098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMED BARRY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ANDERSON, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Director of the U.S. Marshals Service, KEVIN MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting United States Secretary of Homeland Security, DEPORTATION OFFICER RODY ZAMAR, Badge No. 4082 and others
Glatz v. Newcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Defendant:
Ronald Crockett Newcomb, James Bruce Dunn, Tony Lynn Tarwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glatz v. Newcomb
as 3:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Ronald C Newcomb, G.W. McCoig, FBI and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massone v. Washington, et al
as 1:2020cv07906
Defendant:
Donald W Washington, Sharon Watts, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Massone
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
United States Court Security Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Roach v. Washington et al
as 2:2020cv04905
Defendant:
Hon. Paul Irving, Hon. Donald W. Washington, Hon. Christopher Wray and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DON'T SHOOT PORTLAND et al v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv02040
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIA HESTER, DANIALLE JAMES, BEVERLEY BARNUM and others
Defendant:
L. ERIC PATTERSON, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, DONALD W. WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Black Lives Matter Chicago et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv04319
Plaintiff:
Washington Baltimore News Guild, CWA Local 32035, In These Times Unit, South Siders Organized for Unity and Liberation, Black Abolitionist Network and others
Defendant:
Richard K. Cline, L. Eric Patterson, Chad Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
