Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ford v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2015cv07598
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ford
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, City of New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Thomas R. Frieden, M.D and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sygney v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04969
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sygney
Defendant:
City of New York, Dora Shriro, Edward Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv09621
Plaintiff:
Charles Evans
Defendant:
City of New York, Dora Shriro, Kathleen Mulvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullins v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv09045
Plaintiff:
Desmond L. Cullins
Defendant:
City of New York, Dora Shriro and Officer Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv08689
Plaintiff:
Michael White
Defendant:
City of New York, Dora Shriro, Corrections Officer Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lawler v. Arizona Attorney General, Stat, et al
as 09-17910
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LAWLER
Respondent - Appellee:
ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF, DORA SHRIRO and CHARLES L. RYAN
Leo Brown v. Dora Shriro, et al
as 09-16743
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEO EDWARDS BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA SHRIRO and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Swichtenberg v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00690
Plaintiff:
Marvin R. Swichtenberg, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Dora Shriro, State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Junies Jenkins v. Robert Stewart
as 08-70928
Petitioner:
JUNIES A. JENKINS, Jr.
Respondent:
DORA SHRIRO and ROBERT STEWART
Lewis v. Shriro, et al
as 08-15227
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLTON JUSTIN LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA SHRIRO and ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
