Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,959
Thomas v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner: Timothy James Thomas
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff: Joshua T. Murphy
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson, Kevin Punturi, Jermiah Fitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Ball-Bey v. Kyle Chandler, et al
as 24-1417
Plaintiff: Dennis Ball-Bey
Defendant: Kyle Chandler, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Ronald E. Vaughn, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Samuel Dotson, III, Former Police Chief and others
Burke v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00355
Petitioner: Sol D. Burke
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephens v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00170
Petitioner: Derek J. Stephens
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Abundant Life Homes, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff: Ella Morgan
Defendant: Abundant Life Homes, LLC, Jay Williams, Troy Hacker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff: DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Lewis v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00101
Petitioner: Isaiah Lewis
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Schuppan v. Beth Cabell
as 24-6329
Petitioner: GEORGE ZACHARY SCHUPPAN
Respondent: BETH CABELL, Warden, Sussex II State Prison and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Delgadillo v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff: Jose Luis Calderon Delgadillo
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?