Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wesley, Sr v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2013cv02037
Petitioner:
Gary A. Wesley, Sr
Respondent:
Gregg Hershberger, Doug Gansler and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK-BEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Petitioner:
AMUN RA CLARK-BEY
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND, DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, BEN C. CLYBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK-BEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND, et al.,
as 1:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
AMUN RA CLARK-BEY
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, MARTIN O'MALLEY, DOUG GANSLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shiflett v. Gansler et al
as 1:2013cv00032
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Shiflett
Respondent:
Doug Gansler and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEATHERSBEE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
KAREN WEATHERSBEE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DOUG GANSLER, DAVID SOLOMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Hershberger et al
as 8:2011cv02771
Petitioner:
Lawrence Harold Morgan, Jr.
Respondent:
Gregg L. Hershberger and Doug Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darby v. Bartkowski et al
as 3:2011cv04182
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DARREN DARBY
Respondent:
GREG BARTKOWSKI, Unknown Baltimore Officials and Doug Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01971
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Travers v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv01914
Petitioner:
Jason Arias Travers
Respondent:
Patricia Johnson and Doug Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Horning, et al
as 8:2008cv00410
Petitioner:
Lionel Dion Williams
Respondent:
D. Ken Horning and Doug Gansler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
