Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Walker Bowen v. Warden, et al
as 15-11109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALKER D BOWEN, as administrator of the Estate of TERRANCE DESMOND BOWEN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, Baldwin State Prison, DOUG UNDERWOOD, Deputy Warden of Security, Baldwin State Prison and CAGER EDWARD DAVIS, Correction Officer, Baldwin State Prison
Emeka Abanifi, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 14-12207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMEKA MICHAEL ABANIFI, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, LARRY JORDAN, DOUG UNDERWOOD and others
Henderson v. Brewton et al
as 6:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Larry Brewton, J. Brewton, Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Morales et al
as 3:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Torron Jones
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Larry Butts, Timothy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWEN v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
WALKER D BOWEN
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, DOUG UNDERWOOD, ANTHONY BROOKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eric Butler v. Doug Underwood
as 13-10733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC J. BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUG UNDERWOOD, Deputy Warden of Security
ABANIFI v. OUBRE et al
as 5:2012cv00421
Plaintiff:
EMEKA MICHAEL ABANIFI, JR
Defendant:
SHEILA OUBRE, LARRY JORDAN, DOUG UNDERWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PROCTOR v. GEORGIA et al
as 5:2012cv00342
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL PROCTOR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. OWENS et al
as 5:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
BRAJA SMITH
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, VICTOR WALKER, DOUG UNDERWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. UNDERWOOD et al
as 5:2012cv00195
Plaintiff:
LEPONTAE LITTLE
Defendant:
DOUG UNDERWOOD, SMITH, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
