Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jackson v. Rowe et al
as 4:2024cv00456
Defendant:
M John Kane, IV, Dustin Rowe, Yvonne Kauger and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Kane et al
as 4:2024cv00449
Defendant:
Tracy Priddy, Yvonne Kauger, James Winchester and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Heaton, et al
as 19-6033
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEN BROWN, SHEILA KIRK, CINDY KIRBY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERTA ROSE JOSEPHINE JONES
Jones v. Heaton et al
as 5:2018cv01220
Defendant:
Sheila Kirk, Joe Heaton, Douglas Combs and others
Plaintiff:
Alberta Rose Josephine Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Jones et al
as 5:2017cv01287
Plaintiff:
Alberta Rose Josephine Jones
Defendant:
Donald David Jones, George Butner, Douglas Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Combs v. SSA
as 0:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Douglas Combs
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McNeil v. Post et al
as 4:2015cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jerry P McNeil
Defendant:
Dynda Post, Sheila Condren, Jason Carini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PR Group, LLC v. Windmill International, Ltd., et al
as 14-3021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PR Group, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
Windmill International, Ltd., a Virginia corporation and Douglas Combs
PR Group, LLC v. Windmill International, Ltd. et al
as 4:2014cv00401
Plaintiff:
PR Group, LLC
Defendant:
Windmill International, Ltd. and Douglas Combs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Podraza, et al v. Richard Whiting, et al
as 14-1947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Podraza, Dennis Doucet, Jan Arnett and others
Plaintiff:
Patriot Coal Investor Group, Ernesto Espinoza, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, John Ziants and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard M. Whiting and Mark N. Schroeder
Movant:
James Karas, Denis Dehne, Cambridge Retirement System and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
