Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SULLIVAN et al v. CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
GREGORY B SULLIVAN
Defendant:
CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY, JUDGE DOMINIC PILEGGI, EEOC PHILADELPHIA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
VAN DAM v. ROWE et al
as 1:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH VAN DAM
Defendant:
DR ROWE, SARGEANT THAYER and CO AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DREWRY v. WELLPATH INC et al
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DREWRY
Defendant:
WELLPATH INC, DAN RITTER, DR ALI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERBERT v. MEGHAR et al
as 1:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA E HERBERT
Defendant:
DR ANDREW MEGHAR, SAM CORDEIRO, JANET CORDEIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMEDILE v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SMEDILE
Defendant:
DR ROBINSON and DOE
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JANE DOES 1-6 et al v. MILLS et al
as 1:2021cv00242
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOES 1-3, JACK DOES 1-1000, JANE DOES 1-6 and others
Defendant:
JANET T MILLS, JEANNE M LAMBREW, DR NIRAV D SHAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
