Cases 1 - 10 of 916
Day v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jessee Holbrook, Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeiuLio v. Baydu
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Adam M. DeiuLio
Defendant:
Dr. Baydu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Slonaker et al
as 7:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant:
Katlynn Slonaker, Caroline Helsley, Amber Dopkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Short v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Tazewell et al
as 7:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Thomas Short
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Tazewell and Dr. Crystal Large
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
Lea Holbrook, Dr. Happy Smith, Red Onion State Prison Medical Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Allen et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
George Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Robin Allen and Dr. Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Cecil v. Wellpath Health Services et al
as 7:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services and Dr. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
