Cases 1 - 10 of 14
TUCKER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2019cv00846
Defendant:
ADAMS, SGT LUFTWAITE, BOBBY KIMBROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. SETTLE et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
NURSE WILLIAMS, K. ADAMS, B. F. KIMBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. WHITT et al
as 1:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, GUARD OWENS, BOBBY KIMBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00287
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, UNKNOWN NAMED WHITE MALE FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST, MILES KIVETT and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., SMITH/KEEFE COMMISSARY/PROVIDER, CATRINA THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. CRAVEN et al
as 1:2019cv00246
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
ADAMS, KEEFE, SGT. GUARD WHITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Derek Hendricks v. Mr. Casina
as 16-6917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK HENDRICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. CASINA, Medical Supervisor, DOCTOR OWENS and NURSE NELSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KORNEGAY, MR. HAWKINS, DR. DAVIS and others
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
