Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Razzoli v. Richmond University Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv06697
Plaintiff:
Kevin Razzoli
Defendant:
Richmond Hill Medical Center, Dr. Douglas Cohen, Richmond University Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Kaner et al
as 1:2023cv00944
Plaintiff:
Guinette R. Harrison
Defendant:
Dr. Douglas Kaner, DR John Doe and Benefits LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schottenstein v. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) et al
as 1:2020cv09961
Defendant:
Blue Pearl Operations LLC, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Douglas Schottenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Smock v. Bishop et al
as 2:2020cv00407
Defendant:
Dr. Douglas Druzd, James Savage, Toni Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Smock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HM-09, LLC v. Holt et al
as 8:2019cv02820
Defendant:
Florida Department of Health, Dr. Douglas Holt and Douglas Holt
Plaintiff:
HM-09, LLC and Hamburger Mary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Little v. Martin-Morris et al
as 2:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brenda Joyce Little
Defendant:
Harium Martin-Morris , Kay Blume-Smith , Michael DeBell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv08227
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
