Cases 1 - 10 of 1,243
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SMITH v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
ERIC SMITH
Defendant:
WELLPATH, DR. ANNINO, DR. LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NASH v. PHILA DISTRICT ATTY et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PHILA DISTRICT ATTY, PHILA PUB. DEF. and NEW VITAE DR. BEHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. LETIZIO et al
as 2:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR LETIZIO, E. CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SIPPLE et al
as 2:2024cv02336
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant:
DEP. MANDY SIPPLE, UM. FANRAK, LT. CUNNINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FANN v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. FANN, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr LAUREL R. HARRY, ERIC ARMEL, TINA WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
United States, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARCHESE v. 21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 5:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
LOREE M. MARCHESE
Defendant:
21ST CENTURY CYBER CHARTER SCHOOL, Andrea Fox and DR. Matthew Flannery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
HOFFMAN v. BAILEY
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
SARAH ANN HOFFMAN
Defendant:
DR. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
