Cases 1 - 10 of 21
George Druck v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI
as 24-2045
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DRUCK
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI
IN RE: DRUCK
as 2:2024cv00547
Not Yet Classified:
GEORGE DRUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Collier County et al
as 2:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Brandon Rodriguez
Defendant:
Collier County, Kevin Rambosk, SLR Naples Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Christopher Schwenk, et al v. Joseph Garcia, et al
as 23-8017
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LEE SCHWENK and KEITH DRUCK
Respondent:
JOSEPH GARCIA, CORRECTIONS SPECIAL APPLICATION UNIT LLC, YORK COUNTY, Pennsylvania doing business as York County Prison and others
Eagles, Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv03450
Plaintiff:
Eagles, Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Zhengzhou Dechuang Network Technology Co., Ltd., 100% cotton T-shirt BZ Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Sanguinetti v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2021cv00529
Plaintiff:
Jorge Sanguinetti
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Collier County, FL, SLR Naples Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRUCK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv07102
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
BARBARA DRUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Druck v. Smith
as 2:2019cv05794
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
Petitioner:
George Druck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Druck v. Smith
as 1:2019cv02070
Respondent:
Barry Smith and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
George Druck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
