Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Hagedorn v. Obama et al
as 2:2016cv16919
Plaintiff:
Brian Albert Hagedorn
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joseph F. Dunford, Eric Fanning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ijeoma Amadi v. DEA
as 16-60615
Petitioner:
IJEOMA AMADI
Respondent:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Gonzalez-Flores v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00234
Plaintiff:
Felipe de Jesus Gonzalez-Flores
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, Joseph M. Arabit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Soto v. U S Department of Justice et al
as 5:2015cv00286
Petitioner:
Jose Heriberto Soto
Defendant:
U S Department of Justice, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and U S Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Soto v. U S Department of Justice et al
as 6:2015cv00060
Petitioner:
Jose Heriberto Soto
Respondent:
U S Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and U S Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bonds v. Justice et al
as 5:2015cv02311
Plaintiff:
Darryl James Bonds
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Director Drug Enforcement Administration, Asset Forfeiture Section and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Justice et al
as 5:2015cv02314
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Director Drug Enforcement Administration, Asset Forfeiture Section and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Bonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Hammond City et al
as 2:2015cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Payne
Defendant:
Hammond City, Roddy Devall, Rodney Gemar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tejeda-Guerrero v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Marcial E Tejeda-Guerrero
Defendant:
United States of America and Beaumont Drug Enforcement Administration Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael White, M.D. v. DEA
as 14-60832
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. WHITE, Medical Doctor
Respondent:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
