Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Anthony Forney v. Robert Cupp, et al
as 23-5063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY FORNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CUPP, Honorable, LISA N. RICE, Honorable, RUBIN RHEA, District Attorney and others
Williams v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 1:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Qian Williams
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00613
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mark Adams v. MI, et al
as 22-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ALAN ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MARY ADAMS SEMCKEN, SUSAN KAY ADAMS and others
Samson Orusa v. DEA
as 22-3132
Petitioner:
SAMSON KANLA ORUSA, M.D.
Respondent:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Adu-Beniako v. Wykoff Pezon et al
as 2:2021cv12778
Plaintiff:
Solomon Adu-Beniako
Defendant:
Cheryl Wykoff Pezon, Patrick Reimann and Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cincinnati Enquirer v. Dept of Justice, et al
as 21-3966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINCINNATI ENQUIRER, A division of Gannett GP Media, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Solomon Adu-Beniako v. Patrick Reimann, et al
as 21-2978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOLOMON ADU-BENIAKO
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK REIMANN and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Detroit
Jackson v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 1:2021cv00402
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jackson
In Re:
Asset No. 21 DEA675746 Seizurte of $17,895.00 May 7, 2021
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
The Cincinnati Enquirer v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00758
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Enquirer
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
