Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Williams v. Drug Enforcement Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00696
Plaintiff: Qian Williams
Defendant: Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00613
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. Drug Enforcement Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00402
Defendant: Drug Enforcement Administration
Plaintiff: Gregory Jackson
In Re: Asset No. 21 DEA675746 Seizurte of $17,895.00 May 7, 2021
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
The Cincinnati Enquirer v. Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00758
Plaintiff: The Cincinnati Enquirer
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Walker v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01392
Defendant: United States Drug Enforcement Administration, United States of America and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff: Maurice Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Portis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv01214
Defendant: Drug Enforcement Administration, Derek M. Siegle, Unknown Ohio High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Participating Government Agencies and others
Plaintiff: James Portis
In Re: Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. $215,477.00 U.S. Currency et al
as 4:2019cv02439
Defendant: Assorted Jewelry with an Approximate Value of $297,750.00 seized on June 27, 2019, by the Drug Enforcement Administration, pursuant to a Federal Search Warrant, $215,477.00 U.S. Currency seized on June 27, 2019, by the Drug Enforcement Administration, Pursuant to a Federal Search Warrant, $15,465.00 U.S. Currency seized on June 27, 2019 by the Drug Enforcement Administration, Pursuant to a Federal Search Warrant and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Interested Party: Rashie Garner
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Filing Error
as 1:2018cv02838
Plaintiff: PETER G. BELLE, Jr.
Defendant: Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
as 1:2017md02804
Defendant: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City of Toledo, City of Lorain, County of Cuyahoga and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Allergan Finance LLC, HBC Service Company, Discount Drug Mart, Inc. and others
Interested Party: United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Webb County, TX and others
Intervenor: USA Today, Chicago Tribune Company, Los Angeles Times and others
Special Master: Francis McGovern, David Rosenblum Cohen and Cathy Yanni
Respondent: Linda Singer and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
3Rd Party Defendant: Jane Does, Pfizer Inc., King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners
Counter Claimant: Christopher C. Smith and James Coomer
Not Classified By Court: State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Amicus Curiae: Manatee Memorial Hospital, Allegiance Health Center of Ruston, Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and others
Petitioner: Paul Andrew Pyfer, David B. Gustin, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mathews et al v. Drug Enforcement Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00220
Plaintiff: Carnell Matthews and Christopher Owens
Defendant: Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?