Cases 41 - 50 of 269
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HOLMES v. GARMAN et al
as 5:2019cv02854
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK GARMAN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DUANE MARCEL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOHMAN et al v. BONEFISH GRILL, LLC
as 2:2018cv01700
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS HOHMAN and DUANE GULISH
Defendant:
BLOOMIN' BRANDS, INC. and BONEFISH GRILL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SINK et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv05306
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
DUANE ELLIS SINK and ANNE KAY SINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wheeland Family Limited Partnership et al v. Rockdale Marcellus LLC
as 4:2018cv01976
Plaintiff:
Norma Wheeland, Derek Wheeland, Alice Wheeland and others
Counter Plaintiff:
Rockdale Marcellus LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NULL v. MCCALMONT TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv01314
Defendant:
ORRIE DUANE MANNERS, BUREAU VERITAS, DAVID L. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD NULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plunkard v. Marks et al
as 1:2018cv01536
Defendant:
Greencastle Family Practice, D.O. Charles H. Marks, Wellspan OB/GYN and others
Plaintiff:
Chasidy Plunkard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ASBURY et al v. EQT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv01005
Plaintiff:
RONALD AND TRACY LOVRICH, DONALD AND JULIA NEWTON, JOSEPH AND AMY HEBDA and others
Defendant:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P., EQT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
DUANE-TAYLOR v. M. CLARK
as 2:2018cv02952
Petitioner:
THOMAS DUANE-TAYLOR
Defendant:
M. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
