Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Jackson v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2015cv00920
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Walker Jr et al
as 1:2015cv01306
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Roger Walker Jr, Roberta Fews, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. C/O Duckworth et al
as 1:2015cv02320
Plaintiff:
Deon Wilson
Defendant:
C/O Duckworth, C/O Dags, C/O Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. DUCKWORTH et al
as 1:2014cv01854
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DUCKWORTH and JAMES FISCUS
Plaintiff:
GORDON PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kaszuba v. Corley et al
as 1:2014cv01339
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kaszuba
Defendant:
. Corley, Warden Pfister, . Delong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed et al v. Duckworth et al
as 1:2014cv05064
Plaintiff:
Eric S Reed , Soldier's Hymn Music, Inc., Willie Jones, III and others
Defendant:
Kendrick Lamar Duckworth, William T Brown, Mark Anthony Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Charles E. Covey v. State Bank of Toulon
as 14-1650
Debtor:
In the Matter of: DAVID L. DUCKWORTH
Appellee:
STATE BANK OF TOULON
Trustee - Appellant:
CHARLES E. COVEY, Chapter 7 Trustee for David L. Duckworth
Charles E. Covey v. State Bank of Toulon
as 14-1561
Debtor:
In the Matter of: DAVID L. DUCKWORTH
Appellee:
STATE BANK OF TOULON
Trustee - Appellant:
CHARLES E. COVEY, Chapter 7 Trustee for David L. Duckworth
Duckworth, Jr. v. Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2014cv00713
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Duckworth, Jr.
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SISK v. INDIANA et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Defendant:
PAMLA BAILS, BOBBIE BELDEN, CHRISTINE CLEMENS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
