Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Duffy v. Yardi Systems Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01391
Plaintiff:
Mckenna Duffy and Michael Brett
Defendant:
Yardi Systems, Inc., Bridge Property Management, LLC, Calibrate Property Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Sabon v. King County et al
as 2:2021cv01251
Plaintiff:
Ivan Patrick Sabon
Defendant:
King County, Seattle Municipal, David Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv06224
Defendant:
Jessica, Doe, Trina and others
Plaintiff:
Verick Victor Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dieu v Hillwig et al
as 3:2018cv05287
Plaintiff:
Duffy Dieu
Defendant:
James Gilbert Hillwig, Jr and Hillwig Tool LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Duffy et al v. All Seasons Cleaners et al
as 2:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
James M Duffy and Emilie Duffy
Defendant:
All Seasons Cleaners, Tony's Cleaners and All 11 Cleaners in Portland, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duffy vs. Spokane County, et al.
as 2:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Timothy Duffy
Defendant:
Spokane County, Airway Heights Corrections Center, John Does I through X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. IsoRay Inc et al
as 4:2015cv05046
Plaintiff:
Patrick Duffy
Defendant:
IsoRay Inc, Dwight Babcock and Brien Ragle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mills, et al v. City of Tukwila, et al
as 2:2014cv00929
Plaintiff:
Deann R Mills and Victor Duffy, Sr
Defendant:
City of Tukwila , P Hisa , J Vivet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaren v. Ferris, et al
as 2:2013cv02129
Plaintiff:
Thomas McLaren
Defendant:
Melissa Ferris, Peter Goldmark, Nancy Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. United States Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 3:2011cv05945
Plaintiff:
Matilda Jean Duffy
Defendant:
United States Department of Veteran Affairs and Eric K Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
