Cases 1 - 10 of 26
GoldStein & Burton, Inc. v. SugarRoti LLC et al
as 2:2023cv12912
Plaintiff:
GoldStein & Burton, Inc.
Defendant:
SugarRoti LLC, Bina Motiram and Dana DuFrane
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
GoldStein & Burton, Inc. v. SugarRoti LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12912
Plaintiff:
GoldStein & Burton, Inc.
Defendant:
SugarRoti LLC, Bina Motiram and Dana DuFrane
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Cohen (PS) v. Howard et al
as 1:2023cv02221
Plaintiff:
Emily Cohen
Defendant:
Stephen Howard, Dinsmore Tuttle, Michael Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 524 Bankruptcy: Effect of Discharge
Jamerson v. Immel et al
as 1:2023cv02756
Plaintiff:
James Jamerson, Jr
Defendant:
Brian R. Immel, Dufrane Logistiscs, LLC and Crum & Forster Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
DUFRANE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17816
Plaintiff:
GLADYS DUFRANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willette v. Hepp et al
as 2:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Theodore R Willette
Defendant:
Randy Hepp, Emily Propson, Dr Toria M Van Buren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DuFrane v. Northern Management LLC
as 2:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew DuFrane
Defendant:
Northern Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DUFRANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56008
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DUFRANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley v. Kallas et al
as 1:2020cv00563
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bradley, Sr and Brittney Bradley
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, Kevin Kallas, MD, Dr VanBuren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
