Cases 1 - 10 of 367
Andrew Cooperrider, et al v. Maggie Woods, et al
as 24-5351
Plaintiff:
ANDREW COOPERRIDER and DEANS DINER, LLC, dba Brewed
Defendant:
MAGGIE WOODS, Malt Beverage Administrator with the Kentucky Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, in her individual and official capacity, ANDREW G. BESHEAR, Governor of Kentucky, in his individual and official capacity, RAY A. PERRY, Secretary of Public Protection Cabinet, in his individual and official capacity and others
Baker v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Nathan L Baker
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Sheriff Jerry Greene, Warden Kountz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 2:2024mc50259
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Keith Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Letitia James, People of the State of New York and others
Duke's K9 Dash N' Splash, LLC et al. v. Zizka et al.
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Duke's K9 Dash N' Splash, LLC and Michelle Filler
Defendant:
John Zizka, Roy Martin, Laura Chartier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
USA v. Marvin Dukes
as 23-6106
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARVIN DUKES
USA v. Marvin Dukes
as 23-6110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARVIN DUKES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Dukes et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03238
Plaintiff:
Victoria Dukes and Frederick Dukes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
