Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Shelby Resources, LLC v. Duke Drilling Company, Inc.
as 6:2019cv01068
Defendant:
Duke Drilling Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shelby Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Duke v. Pilot Travel Centers LLC
as 2:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Lesley Duke
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Duke v. Petro Stopping Centers, LP et al
as 2:2014cv02027
Plaintiff:
Lesley Duke
Defendant:
Petro Stopping Centers, LP and TravelCenters of America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Duke v. Flying J Inc.
as 2:2014cv02025
Plaintiff:
Lesley Duke
Defendant:
Flying J Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Piland v. Duke Drilling Co., Inc.
as 6:2012cv01459
Plaintiff:
Brian C. Piland
Defendant:
Duke Drilling Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Federal Uniformed Services Employment/Re-Employment Act
Adams v. Campbell et al
as 5:2011cv03080
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Adams
Defendant:
David Campbell, William McCullum, Kathleen McBratney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cooper et al v. Regent Asset Management Solutions - Kansas, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02634
Plaintiff:
Chloe Cooper , Keith M. Henderson, Jr. , Leola C. Barr and others
Defendant:
Regent Asset Management Solutions - Kansas, LLC, Regent Asset Management Solutions North America, LLC, Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. West et al
as 5:2008cv03272
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Jackson
Defendant:
James West and Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fanning et al v. Sitton Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02464
Plaintiff:
Tammy Fanning, Tammy Fanning, Paul Fanning and others
Defendant:
Sitton Motor Lines, Inc. and James F. Duke
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
