Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Duke v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Malika-Mbele Duke
Defendant:
Christopher Alan Montgomery, John Olsen, Stevens County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 2:2020cv01816
Plaintiff:
Duke Young, K221, LLC and K221 LLC
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01757
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Duke v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00309
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Duke
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sahm v. Onslow Bay Financial LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02090
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Onslow Bay Financial LLC, Merscorp Holding Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Teri K Sahm and Teri Kealoha Sahm
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Duke v. Nissen Kaiun Co Ltd et al
as 3:2019cv05226
Defendant:
Nissen Kaiun Co. Ltd., Elsa S and Cleanocean Shipmanagement Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kerry Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Coombes v. Jackson et al
as 2:2019cv00055
Petitioner:
Michael Duke Coombes
Respondent:
Eric Jackson and Michael Obenland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allah v Washington State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2018cv01303
Defendant:
Alex Gonzalez, Dean Davis, Heidi L. Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Allah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith-Dukes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv01184
Plaintiff:
Demitra Smth-Dukes and Demitra Smith-Dukes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Troupe vs. Morrow, et al.
as 4:2018cv05041
Plaintiff:
David Troupe
Defendant:
Lisa Morrow, Torin Mitchel, Rutlage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
