Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Welton v. Santa Rosa Community Health- Dutton Campus et al
as 3:2024cv02236
Plaintiff:
Lana Welton
Defendant:
Santa Rosa Community Health- Dutton Campus and Cynthia Hom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dutton v. Aseptiscope, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dutton
Defendant:
Aseptiscope, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0256 Patent Non-Infringement (Correction of Named Inventor)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Amalfi Viafara v. General Motors LLC et al
as 5:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
Amalfi Viafara
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Rubidoux Motor Co. and Rubidoux Motor Co. a California Corporation doing business as Dutton Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
Hollis v. Allison et al
as 5:2021cv04974
Defendant:
B. Maub, J Arnold, Ron Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Ellis Clay Hollis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lee v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv01633
Defendant:
A. Pachynski, T.R. Teixeira, J Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbert H Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv00909
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph Bick, Sergeant M. Bloise, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubio v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv00921
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph Bick, T.R. Teixeira, Clarence Cryer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Rubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
