Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Stompingbear v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, John Rodgers, Marshall Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutterfield v. Dye et al
as 3:2020cv03029
Defendant:
Probation and Parole Cody Cassell, Deputy Sheriff Troy Dye, Judge Harry G. Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Arlis Sutterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Pierce et al
as 3:2020cv03021
Defendant:
Deputy Jody Pruitt, Chief Deputy Ezra Dewayne Pierce, Searcy CO. Sheriff Kenny Cassell and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie Edward Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2017cv02079
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Dye
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dye v. Kelley
as 5:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Skylar Britton Dye
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dye v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tim Dye
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dye et al v. Wyeth et al
as 4:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
Thelma Dye, Thelma Dye, Litten Dye and others
Defendant:
Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc, Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dye v. Wyeth et al
as 4:2008cv02564
Defendant:
Wyeth and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc
Plaintiff:
Doris F Dye, Doris F Dye and Doris F Dye
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lane v. Dye et al
as 4:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Lane
Defendant:
Jackson E Dye, Jr, Central Arkansas Transit Authority, North Little Rock Arkansas, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
RB Consulting Inc v. Dye-Smith et al
as 4:2007cv00870
Plaintiff:
RB Consulting Inc
Defendant:
Billie Dye-Smith and Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
