Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Carr v. Carr, et al
as 23-8034
Petitioner:
DANIEL E. CARR
Respondent:
RAKHI CARR, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Taunton, MA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, New Bedford and others
Joseph Anderson v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 21-16549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, IAN E. CARR, K. THOMAS and others
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00208
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner, David Sorrells and others
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com and Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com. ASSIGNOR pursuant to Purchase Agreement dated May 30, 2019.
Raymond Carr v. Sheila Everett
as 20-20499
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheila Everett, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond E. Carr
Carr v. Wilkie
as 19-2441
Not Yet Classified:
SAMANTHA E. CARR and ROBERT M. CARR
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Raymond Carr v. Civil Rights Project, et al
as 19-20621
Defendant / Appellee:
7031 KOLL CENTER, HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE, FBI AGENCY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORD OF THE STREETS RAYMOND E. CARR
Raymond Carr v. Ed Gonzalez, et al
as 19-20420
Defendant / Appellee:
ART ACEVEDO, Chief, Houston Police Department, in his individual and official capacity, WELLS FARGO BANK, in its' individual and official capacity, PROBABLE CAUSE JUDGE, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND E. CARR
Raymond Carr v. Bryan Collier, et al
as 19-50446
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRYAN COLLIER and DIRECTOR PAMELA THIELKE, Board of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND E. CARR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
